Would you sell your home with an online estate agent? (Daily Mail)

Complaints rise, firms struggle and the High Street is fighting back, but you could save thousands

  • Internet agents made 20,775 sales last summer, 7.6 per cent of all exchanges 
  • Ombudsman received 398 calls about online estate agents last year 
  •  This is compared to 244 the year before, a rise 63 per cent in complaints 

Online estate agents promise to sell our homes quickly, easily, and at a fraction of the cost of their High Street rivals.

But, as thousands of us put our homes on the market this summer, some internet agents are struggling, their share of the market has stalled, and complaints are rising.

Traditional High Street agents can charge commission on up to 3 per cent of the sale — £6,780 on today’s £227,000 average house price. The new breed of online agencies offered to slash the cost by thousands of pounds with a range of basic fees that can be paid upfront or down the line.

But Money Mail has found that many of their deals are not as sweet as they seem — and many will still charge you even if they don’t sell your home.

So would an online estate agent work for you?

Experts say some internet agents are little more than ‘call centre’ staff that simply list your property online — leaving you to do all the work, from taking photographs, to conducting the viewings and handling negotiations.

Online agent Emoov, which has since relaunched, went bust late last year, while shares in Purplebricks plunged earlier this year after it slashed its sales forecast and announced that two top executives were leaving.

Meanwhile the Property Ombudsman received 398 calls about online estate agents last year compared to 244 the year before — a rise of 63 per cent.

Typical gripes were around transaction handling, fair treatment and problems with timescales.

Internet agents made 20,775 house sales last summer — 7.6 per cent of all exchanges. But the latest stats from data firm TwentyCi, for the final quarter of 2018, show their share of the market has fallen to 7.2 per cent.

Buying agent Henry Pryor says he often hears complaints that online firms are only available via email and do not have knowledge of the property or area to add value to the sale process. He says: ‘The ones I am unimpressed by could be more accurately described as ‘call-centre’ agents perhaps, and their business model seems to be more of a listing service than a selling job.

‘In a strong seller’s market, slapping an advert online and sitting back waiting for the phone to ring often worked, but in a tougher market, houses need to be sold and selling takes time and effort.’ Yet the no-frills approach of online estate agents might work for sellers in certain homes. And if you live in a big city or development where property demand is high, a buyer might not be too hard to find.

Rosalind Renshaw, the editor of Property Industry Eye, says online estate agents may suit confident sellers who are able to conduct their own viewings, negotiations and push the sale through.

Yet some buyers, she says, prefer to be shown around the property by an agent rather than the owners, who are more attached. She also says that progressing the sale is the real challenge.

She adds: ‘Getting the initial offer is the easy bit. It is the getting the sale over the line that is more difficult.’

WHAT THE RIVAL FIRMS ARE OFFERING 

James Bunker, head of property at solicitors Vardags, says online estate agents do provide a much-needed and much-wanted service to sellers around the country.

He says they tend to attract sellers with properties in the mid-to-lower end of the property market, while those with higher value homes, quirky or unusual properties tend to favour traditional estate agents with expert knowledge and experience at marketing and negotiating. He adds: ‘It is a fallacy that such knowledge and skills do not add value in all property transactions, but never more so than when it comes to prime central London, and similar prime areas around the country.

‘Selling a property often involves a person’s most valuable asset, and entrusting it to someone other than an expert is something that should be done with caution.’

Mark Hayward, chief executive of estate agents industry body NAEA Propertymark, says online agents will suit some people’s lifestyles in a ‘digital age’. He says: ‘Choice is important; others prefer face-to-face interaction and will therefore choose a high-street agent.

‘For most people, their home is their biggest asset, so it’s crucial they spend time researching the best option.’

COULD THEY SELL YOUR HOME?

YES

David Withers, a retired kitchen designer, says he saved more than 60 per cent in fees with online estate agents.

David, 68, initially paid £895 to Tepilo, TV presenter Sarah Beeny’s online agency, in April last year to list his mother’s one-bed bungalow in Suffolk. This included professional photographs and a floorplan.

Good deal: David Withers says he saved more than 60 per cent in fees with online estate agents

Good deal: David Withers says he saved more than 60 per cent in fees with online estate agents

Last May, Tepilo merged with Emoov — which went bust in December. In January, David signed with Property Eagle, which offered Emoov customers a special deal at £99 for six months of sales work. The firm usually charges £399 upfront or £999 on completion (plus VAT).

David, who lives in Linton, Cambridgeshire, with his wife Lynda, 65, says: ‘Someone would always get back to me — even when they had finished for the day and at weekends.’

Property Eagle listed the property at £205,000, managed the visits and correspondence.

A sale was agreed in March at £195,000 and it completed the next month. 

NO

Yvonne and David Filby did not have a single viewing after signing with Purplebricks last August. They were told eight people had made appointments to view their two-bed bungalow in Strood, Kent — but all cancelled.

The couple, who are pensioners, plan to move closer to their daughter in Northampton.

No show: Yvonne and David Filby did not have a single viewing after signing with Purplebricks last August

No show: Yvonne and David Filby did not have a single viewing after signing with Purplebricks last August

They chose Purplebricks to avoid up to 3 per cent in commission on their £325,000 house, deferred the £899 fee for 10 months and paid £300 for an agent to conduct viewings.

They have since hired a local estate agent, which charges 1 per centcommission, and have had five viewings since December.

A Purplebricks spokesman says: ‘The vast majority of our customers sell quickly and give five-star feedback, but there will always be a few properties which are harder to sell.’

Read More

Contract race underway for £500m Tottenham Hale scheme

Plans have been unveiled for a £500m development in Tottenham Hale containing seven residential blocks.

The first block will be built at 1 Ashley Road

The scheme from developer Argent Related will contain 1,030 new homes alongside retail and commercial space.

The Enquirer understands that construction will start in October as contractors currently bid for the first block at 1 Ashley Road containing 183 apartments designed by Alison Brooks Architects.

Tom Goodall, CEO of the project, said: “Tottenham Hale is the perfect location for Argent Related’s first development: it’s an incredibly diverse, energetic, and welcoming area of London that deserves an animated and people-friendly urban landscape to match.

“For us, the challenge, and indeed the reward, will be in creating a new centre that feels inclusive and exciting as much as well-managed and long-lasting; ultimately a place that brings joy to residents and the surrounding community.”

Read More

Decision on £3bn London Canada Water scheme in July

Property developer British Land is hoping for a planning decision in July on its 5.5m sq ft Canada Water scheme in London.

Canada Water masterplan for Rotherhithe

The vast mixed-use scheme, on the south side of the Thames in Rotherhithe, ranks as the London developer’s most ambitious scheme over the next 10 years.

This morning the developer said the vast scheme was set to go before Southwark council planners in the summer.

This will involve a detailed application for the first three buildings totalling 576,000 sq ft and outline planning for the 1.8m sq ft first phase with a development value of £700m.

The first three buildings will provide 265 homes, with around 35% affordable.

Building A1 will provide both residential and workspace, building A2 will be focused on workspace and a new leisure centre, and the third known as K1 will be wholly residential.

Chris Grigg, Chief Executive said: “Our plans envisage the development of a new urban centre for London, including commercial, office and community space as well as around 3,000 new homes, so will represent a core part of our plan to grow scale in residential.”

Read More

Tenant Fee Ban and Reduced Deposits

What are the Tenant Fees Act and the Deposit Cap?

The Tenant Fees Act restricts what money agents and landlords can ask tenants to pay in addition to rent.  Certain fees and charges are ‘permitted payments’. Everything else is a ‘prohibited payment’.

As part of the incoming legislation, the level of deposit landlords and letting agents in England can collect from tenants will be capped at the equivalent of five weeks’ rent for tenancies where the annual rent is up to £50,000.  For those tenancies where the annual rent exceeds £50,000, the deposit will be capped at the equivalent of six weeks’ rent.

 

When does the Tenant Fees Ban and Deposit Cap apply?

The Tenant Fees Act, and Deposit Cap outlined within this legislation, comes into force on 1 June 2019.  It will apply to:

  • Agents and landlords in England
  • New Assured Shorthold Tenancies (ASTs) and renewed tenancies (excluding statutory periodic tenancies for a period of 12 months) that arise after the legislation comes into force.

What does this mean for existing tenancy agreements?

If a tenancy agreement began before 1 June 2019, agents and landlords can continue to charge tenants fees written into that agreement (e.g. check-out or renewal fees) until 31 May 2020. From 1 June 2020 onwards, the tenancy term requiring that payment will become null and void.

Should a tenant make such a payment, it must be returned within 28 days. Failing this, agents and landlords will be treated for the purposes of the Act as having required the tenant to make a prohibited payment.

What are the penalties for taking a prohibited payment?

Trading Standards can order an agent or landlord to repay a prohibited payment to a tenant, together with interest.  They can also impose a financial penalty of up to £5,000 for each breach of the legislation.  Repeated breaches are a criminal offence which can lead to unlimited fines and/or banning orders.

A Section 21 notice seeking possession of a property let on an Assured Shorthold Tenancy cannot be used until any prohibited payments have been returned to the tenant.

How does the legislation affect tenancy deposits?

The legislation does not affect agents or landlords from taking tenancy deposits; they are a permitted payment.  Deposits for ASTs still need to be protected in a government-approved tenancy deposit protection scheme.

There is no requirement to refund deposit amounts exceeding the applicable five or six eek limit where a fixed-term agreement entered into before 1 June 2019 becomes a statutory periodic tenancy.

Where a tenant renews their tenancy by signing a new fixed-term agreement on or after 1 June 2019, any amount of their existing deposit which exceeds the applicable five or six week limit for the new tenancy must be refunded.

Further information: Guidance for Landlords and Agents

Read More